A FAIR FIGHT, IN WRITING

Slate vs WriterDuet: two philosophies of co-writing.

WriterDuet pioneered live co-typing in the cloud, and it's genuinely good at it. Slate takes the opposite bet: your pages live on your Mac, and collaboration happens in deliberate passes you review and merge. Which is right depends on how your partnership actually writes.

Written by the people who make Slate — bias disclosed, details from public pages as of July 2026, corrections welcome at support@slatescript.app.

The short version: if your writing partnership works best both typing in the same document at the same moment — a live room, a sprint on a deadline — WriterDuet is built for exactly that. If your collaboration is really an exchange of passes — "take the weekend, do your version, I'll read the whole thing" — Slate's proposed-revisions model matches how you already work, keeps every page on your own disk, and costs less.

Side by side

SlateWriterDuet
Price$79/year flat, every feature, 30-day trial (no card)Free tier (limited projects); paid plans ≈ $10–14/month, discounted annually
Collaboration modelProposed revisions: your partner writes a pass on their own draft, you review it line-by-line, comment, and merge — or declineReal-time co-typing with chat — both cursors in one doc, live
Where scripts liveOn your Mac, as plain .fountain text — no server of ours existsCloud-first (with offline modes and backup exports)
AccountsNone — the trial starts when you open the appAccount required
Works offlineAlways — it's a native Mac app with local filesDesktop/offline modes on paid plans
Does your partner have to pay?No — reading and reviewing/merging proposals is free foreverFree tier exists with limits; full collaboration is smoothest when both subscribe
PlatformsMac only (Apple Silicon & Intel)Browser, Windows, Mac, mobile
Rewrite safetyGit-style drafts: branch, word-level compare, true 3-way merge, revertVersion history and restore
Story toolsBeats pinned to actual script lines; board that moves scenes when you move cardsIndex cards and outlining tools
AINone, deliberately — nothing you write is read by or trains any modelAI-assisted features available (see their site)
File exchangeImports .fdx, Fountain, plain text · exports Fountain, PDF, teleprompter PDFImports/exports .fdx, Fountain, PDF and more

WriterDuet details summarized from writerduet.com as of July 2026 — plans and features change; check their pages for the fine print.

Choose WriterDuet if…

Choose Slate if…

The part nobody puts in a table

Live co-typing is impressive the first time you see it. But ask working partnerships how they actually write and most describe turns: you take the pass, I take the read. Real-time editing optimizes for the rare moment you're both typing; Slate optimizes for everything around it — the honest compare when the pass comes back, the merge that doesn't eat either version, the paper trail of who changed what and why. That's the bet. Try both and keep whichever matches your partnership.

The fair test: send your co-writer one scene, have them do a pass, and review it as a proposed revision. If the merge doesn't feel better than a shared cursor, keep your $79.

Download Slate — free for 30 days, no card

Also: Slate vs Final Draft · Switching from Final Draft